ONLY DO THIS UNTIL NOW, FOR BETTER OR WORSE. TEXTBOOKS OFFER:
So far, the textbooks had been one of the few proud in our basic education and an important resource for teaching.
ones who were using were higher in those who had long before 1993. Now the have changed, but new is not better at all. Change to back me seems absurd.
For sample: English for first grade is limited to a set of instructions illustrated with cartoons, apparently aimed at students, but in reality, is for teachers! There are no spaces for writing or exercises to reflect on the issues. No literary or informational texts interesting that encourage children to dabble in learning written language. You do not have pictures that reflect cultural and natural diversity of our country. Present work projects that involve speaking, listening, reading and writing in the classroom and the activities suggested could be enticing, but to develop them in the classroom is not required that each child possesses the instructions or description of the "project", as with a copy to the teacher would have sufficed.
There is no work of reading, basic child recreation and to develop various group activities. With this type of texts to ensure that students integrate their own library. The new book loses its meaning at the end of the school year. Of course the teachers are trained to work with what we have on hand for use in the classroom library, but it requires at least one job of reading together. Why spend thousands of books in both direction? There
reading texts, but a physical education! The school time is very limited, what we're going to spend?, What books to read instructions or do the activities? The covers do not invite children to come. Hopefully to see, compare and express their views, and if I have reason, someone around this decline. RIO GRANDE
CREN FOR EDUCATION. 
0 comments:
Post a Comment